Each criterion or requirement of the case's visa shows how many of its elements the record supports, the preliminary assessment and its review status. Shown here for an EB-1A case.
EvaluationDr. Amara Okonkwo, EB1-2026-014Sample data
Criterion
Elements
Assessment
Review
(i) Prizes or awards
3 of 4
Needs additional evidence
New proposal to review
(ii) Membership in associations
2 of 4
Not currently supported
Rejected mapping
(iii) Published material about the applicant
2 of 4
Weakly supported
Needs review
(iv) Judging the work of others
3 of 3
Potentially supported
Approved
(v) Original contributions
2 of 3
Needs additional evidence
Edited by attorney
(vi) Scholarly articles
4 of 4
Potentially supported
Approved
(vii) Artistic exhibitions
—
Not evaluated
Not applicable
(viii) Leading or critical role
3 of 3
Potentially supported
Needs review
(ix) High salary
1 of 2
Needs additional evidence
Evidence requested
(x) Commercial success
—
Not evaluated
Not applicable
Assessments are preliminary and internal. They are not legal determinations, and the product never estimates the likelihood of approval.
Documents become structured facts.
Upload a whole folder. Each file is checked, read page by page, categorized, and turned into facts that keep their exact wording and page.
Documents31 files, 418 pagesSample data
Document
Category
Status
Letter from the Editor-in-Chief3 pages
Judging / Reviewing
Extracted
Employer letter2 pages
Employment
Extracted
Scan_0042.jpg1 page, read with OCR
Awards
Needs review
Article, German original4 pages
Media Coverage
Translation needed
Publication list212 pages
Publications
Extracted
Facts from the employer letter
Position: Principal Research Scientistp. 1, “As Principal Research Scientist, Dr. Okonkwo leads…”Role
Team size: 11 peoplep. 1, “…the eleven-person imaging group”Role
Start date: June 2019p. 1, corrected by P. Shah, original “Jun 2019”Corrected
Corrections are stored beside the original extraction, never over it, with who changed what and when.
Evidence mapped many-to-many.
One recommendation letter can speak to original contributions and a leading role. One criterion can rest on several documents. Hover a document or a criterion to trace the connections.
Evidence mapDr. Amara OkonkwoSample data
Documents
Criteria
Select a document or criterion to trace how the evidence connects.
Gaps and contradictions, stated precisely.
Conflicts are classified, not assumed to be problems. Gaps name the missing document and the element it would prove.
Possible discrepancyEmployment start dateNeeds attorney review
CV, page 1
“Principal Research Scientist, March 2019 to present.”
Employer letter, page 1
“Dr. Okonkwo joined the company in June 2019 as Principal Research Scientist.”
Possible explanation: the offer was accepted in March and employment began in June. Confirm with the applicant before filing.
Gaps2 of 7 shownSample data
(ix)
Occupation-specific wage survey data for the same role and locationProves element 2, high in relation to others in the field. Ask the applicant for the employer's compensation benchmarking, if any.
High
(i)
Selection criteria and number of submissions for the 2023 awardProves element 2, national or international recognition.
Medium
The whole record, as its own step.
Meeting a count of criteria doesn't establish eligibility. The final review reads the whole record against the visa's standard, with every point linked to its evidence, and leaves the judgment to the attorney.
Final meritsDr. Amara OkonkwoPreliminary, not attorney reviewed
Supports sustained acclaim
Continuous peer review for a leading journal, 2022 to 2024Editor's letter p. 2; 2 confirmations
Method adopted in clinical practiceHospital chair letter p. 1
Limits the claim
Adoption shown at one institution onlyNo independent adoption evidence yet
Media coverage is limited and lacks audience dataArticle p. 1
For attorney judgment: whether the record shows the applicant is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
A report partners can read in ten minutes.
Criterion analysis, final merits, missing documentation and items for review, with every statement footnoted to its source page. AI-drafted sections stay marked until an attorney approves them.
Preliminary case evaluation
Dr. Amara Okonkwo, EB-1A extraordinary ability
EB1-2026-014 Evaluation 2 Framework 2026.1
Preliminary, not attorney reviewed
Executive summary
The record contains direct, corroborated evidence for three criteria and partial support for three more. The strongest claim is judging[4]. The clearest gaps are comparative salary data[11] and the recognition level of the 2023 award[2].
Criteria
(iv)
Judging the work of others
Potentially supported
(vi)
Authorship of scholarly articles
Potentially supported
(viii)
Leading or critical role
Potentially supported
(v)
Original contributions
Needs additional evidence
Missing documentation
Wage survey data for the role and location[11]
Selection criteria for the 2023 award[2]
For attorney review
Employment start date, March or June 2019[1][7]
Whether to claim (v) or rely on final merits
[1] CV, p. 1. [2] Award letter, p. 1. [4] Letter from the Editor-in-Chief, p. 2. [7] Employer letter, p. 1. [11] Offer letter, p. 2.
The AI proposes. Attorneys decide.
AI suggestions, human corrections and approved conclusions are separate records. When new documents arrive, changes are proposed beside your work, never written over it.
Evaluation 3 is ready.12 new documents, 2 proposals changed, 18 approved findings unchanged.
(iv)Editor's letter mapped to actual participation as a judgeLetter from the Editor-in-Chief, p. 2Approved by D. Rivera
(v)Assessment narrowed to one hospital's adoptionExplanation edited before approvalEdited by attorney
(ii)Senior Member grade proposed as outstanding achievementGrade is tenure-based, not achievement-basedRejected by attorney
(ix)No comparison data for compensationRequest sent to the applicantEvidence requested
(i)Program listing shows 1,400 submissions for the awardAward program, p. 4, uploaded todayAI proposal, needs review
Every case in the firm, at a glance.
Partners see where each petition stands. Paralegals see what to chase next.
Rivera & Okafor LLPSample data
Active cases24
In evaluation7
Findings awaiting review132
Completed this quarter11
Active cases by status
Documents requested5
Processing3
AI analysis4
Attorney review7
More evidence needed5
Recent activity
D. Rivera approved criterion (iv) for Dr. Okonkwo12 minutes ago
P. Shah uploaded 12 documents to EB1-2026-0191 hour ago
M. Chen rejected a mapping for criterion (ii)3 hours ago
See it on one of your own cases.
A walkthrough on a case of your choosing, with your team.